14 Aug 2010
by in Uncategorized Tags: asian friends, faces, racism, self image
Black men complain about racism all the time and hate White men, but then try to date White women to "get back" at White men. I have met Black men in my life and they are terrible men to their women, and they complain too much. then Asian women are the same way, they think they are ugly and they hate their natural faces so they wear things to look more Western and White. then, they love White men and will do anything for them.
Black men and Asian women worship White people and it is weird to me. I've known many and I'm not being PC, why are they like this?
I don't think they do. of all my Black and Asian friends only a small minority date outside of their ethnic group. And none of my friends have spouses that are not of the same ethnic group. I've dated both Black and Asian women and have never met one who did not have a positive self-image and good Lord, man, they do not do anything to please anyone that they simply don't want to do. If those people that you describe are out there, I've never met any of them.
this is absolutely not true, actually very few asian women / african american men are like that.. it actually can offend people if you think that is true about everyone.. because what you are doing is generalizing, and man is it annoying. seriously some asian women are like what you mentioned, but many are pretty fine with being who they are.. some could care less about becoming something that they're not. I mean people have pride okay? they're not going to renounce who they are to begin with for another race.
"I've known many…"
But you don't know all, right?
I don't think black guys date white women to "get back" at white men, but rather because they are attracted to those white women. You seem like you just got caught with the wrong crowd of them. Sure, a lot of black men are pretty disrespectful, but not all. They're definitely not the only race of men who disrespect their ladies.
I'm Asian. not yet a women, but I would like to think I'm old enough to take a stand on this. I don't worship white guys, and definitely will not do absolutely anything for one. I've met pretty nice white guys, but then I've also met those that had a such a bad personality, I thought they had a face in need of a fist.
The topic of "non-whites trying to look white" always bugs me. I personally love my Asian features, and dying hair or changing clothes won't make me look less Asian.
Tons of people of all races now live in the U.S. They shop they same places that white people shop. It's not that they want to look just like white people, but because they have integrated into American culture. not every non-white person who walks into an Aeropostale store and buys something is trying to look white.
Sure, blonde hair is considered "white," but why do we have to get hung up on it? It's not like there's anything wrong with a non-white person dying it that color. maybe they feel like a bit of a change once in a while. It's not always, "oh gosh, I want blonde hair like those white people."
Don't get me wrong, I love my white friends. still, I don't hate myself and worship them as better.
I'm an Asian girl and I think I've got pretty face, to be honest :p!
As for makeup, well makeup itself is a sort of attempt to look prettier or 'different', regardless races. would you say White women wear makeup to look 'whiter'?
ok asian women associate white with being rich therefore white men are rich and can give them a better life than asians
asian men think white women are either loose and easy to sleep with same goes for black men or they see them as 'trophy' wifes this isn't to say they think wow white = amazing it's more like they use them as a status symbol
and then on top of all this is the media which portrays white to be kind, rich, loving etc alot of my cousins in asia used to ask if white guys in the west are really gentlemen like they see in movies etc so you can see how the media is giving a false perception.. soo yeah thats the reason but now adays half asians have replaced white people on catwalks, tv, in magazines etc within asia for example Daniel Henney, Liah Dizon, Bekki and many more
I'm an Asian girl, and never in my life did I ever want to be White. Neither do any of my friends, family and relatives.
Seriously? this question is really messed up.
Why do Black guys and Asian girls hate themselves and love White people?
21 Jul 2010
by in Uncategorized Tags: indignity, moral indignation, political discontent, racism, rationalization
Context is everything.
In this piece you will see video evidence of racism coming from a federal appointee and NAACP award recipient and in another clip from the same event a perfect rationalization for why the Tea Party needs to exist.
But first the context:
For the past week, Americans who consider themselves aligned with the Tea Party movement have suffered the indignity of being falsely labeled racist by the NAACP and their pro-bono publicity managers, the main stream media. the constant calls to “repudiate the racists from your ranks” have not only been insulting, but have also served to force a false standard upon America’s fastest-growing and most vibrant political movement that no other group could ever live up to nor would ever be asked to live up to.
While the media has chosen to do the Democratic Party’s bidding in allowing for the NAACP to negatively and falsely brand the millions strong, loosely affiliated tea party phenomenon as “racist”, the moral indignation over race and racism has taken center stage in a summer of economic and political discontent.
The NAACP, an undeniable weapon in the Democratic Party’s arsenal, was more than happy to exploit this nation’s sensitive racial schism for possible political gain. the Democratic Party and the NAACP, needless to say, are playing with fire.
From the beginning of the Tea Party movement, the Left, its aiders and abettors at MSNBC, the NY Times and other reliable left of center propaganda venues, raised race as the driving force behind the movement, even though the evidence was never there. MSNBC even egregiously cut off a black protester’s head in a photograph of a man carrying a gun to a rally in order to discuss that anti-black racism was rearing its head in America.
But it got even more blatant when Congressmen Andre Carson and John Lewis and other Congressional Black Caucus members staged a walk through the Tea Party crowd in front of the capitol the day before the health care vote. They claimed they were threatened by a violent mob and were subjected to the vile N word slur fifteen times. with the unpopularity of the toxic health care bill that the majority of Americans did not want, the Democrats needed a November strategy. Neutralizing the growing Tea Party movement with charges of racism was clearly its post-health care reform vote priority.
What they did not expect was that new media would successfully challenge the propaganda of the old media and the Congressmen’s racial smear.
First, my $100,000 video challenge for any evidence of racism was met with crickets. the CBC, looking for a fight, and taking to the airwaves to accuse the Tea Party of racism made a 180 degree turn and went into hiding when challenged on the truthfulness of the outrageous allegations. from camera hogs to ostriches in snap of a finger.
When the media chose to ignore that Representatives Lewis and Carson’s story was falling apart, we dug deeper. we found four videos from the moment Rep. Carson claimed the racist Tea Party incident occurred. the four videos, which include audio, show beyond a reasonable doubt that the incident was a manufactured lie. That lie that was supposed to be the centerpiece in the Democratic strategy to destroy the Tea Party. the videos had been available on YouTube almost immediately after the incident occurred and could have been found by any reporter interested in investigating the truthfulness of Rep. Carson’s claim.
While the media ignored these newsworthy revelations, the CBC remained in hiding and ignored a letter in good faith from the Tea Party Federation repudiating all forms of racism, but also asking for the CBC’s help in investigating the Capitol Hill incident. the silence from the CBC was deafening.
The NAACP and the Congressional Black Caucus do not want racial harmony. They want political victory, and the race card is their Stradivarius.
Three months later, the NAACP decided to “double-down” on the fabricated “”Tea Party/racism” narrative and has the gall to include the disproved Capitol Hill “N Word” non-incident as their formal condemnation of the Tea Party. Simply by snapping its figures, the mainstream media again parroted lies. the Tea Party was guilty until it proved itself innocent. a most un-American and, dare I say, culturally Marxist construct.
In fact, it’s worse. the media that provided the left a platform to accuse the Tea Party, all the while refusing to air any exculpatory evidence. Again, the mainstream media inserts itself as the number one weapon in the progressive weapons stash. Political correctness, as the Duke Lacrosse case exemplified, trumps all in PC America and her afflicted media.
But the new media will not be silenced. It will not allow for the main stream media to propagate hateful and hurtful lies in order to save the Democratic Party from the toxic choices it has made over the past few years. And by bringing up race, and demanding a zero tolerance of racism, the left, and the NAACP in particular, has opened itself up for scrutiny.
We are in possession of a video from in which Shirley Sherrod, USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development, speaks at the NAACP Freedom Fund dinner in Georgia. in her meandering speech to what appears to be an all-black audience, this federally appointed executive bureaucrat lays out in stark detail, that her federal duties are managed through the prism of race and class distinctions.
In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. she describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn’t do everything she can for him, because he is white. Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help. But she decides that he should get help from “one of his own kind”. she refers him to a white lawyer.
Sherrod’s racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups’ racial tolerance.
The second video affirms the real reason there is tension between the Democratic Party and a growing mass of middle Americans — and it’s not because of race.
The NAACP which has transformed from a civil rights group to a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party and social-justice politics, supports a new America that relies less on individualism, entrepreneurialism and American grit, but instead giddily embraces, the un-American notion of unaccountability and government dependence. Shirley Sherrod, a federal appointee who oversees over a billion dollars of federal funds, nearly begs black men and women into taking government jobs at USDA — because they won’t get fired.
This is why the Democratic Party is scared. this is why the NAACP is scared. this is why black conservatives, previously marginalized as “Uncle Toms” by these progressive bullies, and shamefully, the NAACP, are coming out of the woodwork to join and, in many cases, lead the Tea Party movement.
The emerging Tea Party nation understands that the media has focused on the manufactured racial schism while intentionally ignoring the schism between free market thinkers and government expansionists, that the latter of which is brazen in its desire to transform America into a European-model welfare state with a healthy dose of socialism.
It’s unfortunate that the NAACP’s recent resolution and false accusations have forced us to show you video 1 when video 2 is the bigger problem. That’s not to say video 1 is not a problem, but this country can ill afford, in this time of economic peril, to waste our time poking and prodding at the racial hornet’s nest that was supposed to have been removed with this post-racial presidency. But now President Obama and the modern-day Democrat party reveal they are anything but post-racial.
Yet again, the juxtaposition of the real video evidence shown here versus the mainstream media’s straight faced reportage of the NAACP’s baseless accusations demonstrates that, once again, the American main stream media has asserted itself as the number one enemy of the truth, when the facts don’t fit the left-wing narrative. Like the NAACP, it has become no better than Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson in its willingness to exploit race for political ends and their unflinching support of the Obama’s left-wing agenda.
» Video Proof: The NAACP Awards Racism–2010 – Big Government
21 Jul 2010
by in Uncategorized Tags: ample evidence, excuse, goodmorning america, naacp, racism, sherrod
Afterlaunching what has now been conclusively shown to be an unfair andfalse attack on Shirley Sherrod, Andrew Breitbart is scrambling to justify hisdecision to post the deceptive video. He nowsaysthat his blogpost — which smeared Sherrod as racist — was “not aboutShirley Sherrod. It’s not aboutShirley Sherrod. I can say it20 times. It’s about the NAACP.” In fact, there is ample evidence that Breitbartdirectly went after Sherrod.
Andif hisclaim that the NAACP tolerates racism is based on the debunked claim that Sherrod’s speech showsshe is racist, doesn’t his whole excuse fall apart? well, Breitbart claimed on Fox News last nightthat the video proves there are racists among the NAACP because “the audience was laughing andapplauding as she described how she maltreated the white farmer,” and he arguedthat the audience did not “know that there was going to be a point ofredemption” in her story.
On GoodMorning America today, Breitbart again claimed that his video shows that”at an NAACP event, people are applauding racism.” and he demonstrated:
In his initialpost, Breitbart described the audience reaction as “nodding approval andmurmurs of recognition and agreement.” and that was before we all hadaccess to the full video and the proper context. now, he says that the audiencewas “applauding” in approval of discrimination. In fact, Breitbart’s claim that the audience was applaudingas she “described how she maltreated the white farmer” is demonstrably false.
First of all, the full video shows that the audience didhave reason to understand where Sherrod’s speech was going and that her storywas about the importance of moving beyond race. Before getting into the storyabout the “white farmer,” Sherrod previewed the lesson that she learned:
[16:34] SHERROD: God is good. I cantell you that. When I made that commitment, I was making that commitment toblack people — and to black people only. But you know God will show youthings and he’ll put things in your path so that you realize that the struggleis really about poor people –
AUDIENCE:All right. All right.
SHERROD:– you know. the first time I was faced with having to help a white farmer savehis farm. He took a long time talking but he was trying to show me he wassuperior to me — I knew what he was doing.
Herstory begins around 16:30 in the video.Contrary to Breitbart’s claim, the audience does not applaud at any point during the story about her interaction with the farmer.
Nevertheless,media outlets are already uncritically reporting Breitbart’s attempt to coverhis ass. the New York Times reports:
“They’retrying to make this about me and Shirley Sherrod. This is about the N.A.A.C.P.,” hesaid by phone. He said that the civil rights group had “spent an inordinateamount of airtime trying to brand the Tea Party as racist” while toleratingracism itself.
The Washington Times wrote:
Mr. Breitbart,whose Big Government blog posted the video, said Tuesday that the point was theNAACP audience’s reaction to mrs. Sherrod’saccount of her past actions.
“This wasnot about Shirley Sherrod. This was about the NAACP attacking the Tea Party andthis is showing racism at an NAACP event. I did not ask for Shirley Sherrod to befired,” he told CNN, adding that mrs. Sherrod “should have the right todefend herself. But what you see on the video are people … applauding her overtracism that she is representing.”
And the Los Angeles Times reported:
Breitbart told CNN’s “John King, USA” that releasing the videowas “not about Shirley Sherrod.”
“This wasabout the NAACP attacking the tea party, and this is showing racism at an NAACPevent,” he said.
Howcan these outlets actually repeat Breitbart’s claim that this was “not aboutShirley Sherrod,” when it clearly was? Didn’t anyone read what Breitbart hadwritten? Inhis initial poston July 19, Breitbart claimed that the video is “evidence of racism coming froma federal appointee” and that Sherrod discriminated against a white farmer inher “federal duties” as the USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development. the videoitself also included text that said. “Ms. Sherrod admits that in herfederally appointed position, overseeing over a billion dollars she discriminatesagainst people due to their race.” Breitbart then posted a tweetasking, “Will Eric Holder’s DOJ hold accountable fed appointee Shirley Sherrodfor admitting practicing racial discrimination?” after the USDA forced Sherrod out of herposition in response to the deceptive video, Big Government celebrated with a posttitled: “Racist Govt Official/NAACP Award Recipient Resigns after BigGovernment Expose.”
Thingsquickly took a turn for the worse for Breitbart. Sherrod told the AtlantaJournal-Constitution that Breitbart’s video completely distorted themeaning of her remarks, and media outlets – aside from Fox News, which repeatedly aired thecropped video and called Sherrod a racist – began calling for Breitbart torelease the full video. Breitbart was then forced to admit that he did not havethe full video and that he had smeared Sherrod as a racist based on a 3 minuteclip that cuts her off in the middle of her speech, indeed in the middle of asentence. CNN later interviewedthe “white farmer” who Breitbart claimed Sherrod discriminated against, and he said her critics”don’t know what they’re talking about” and that Sherrod had done “her levelbest” to help him save his farm. With the full video now available,everyone can see plainly that the facts are basically the opposite ofwhat Breitbart claimed them to be.
Thewhitewash began immediately. Big Government inexplicably criticized the Obamaadministration for believing and reacting to what Bretibart had called “videoproof” of racism by a federal official. Glenn Beck and FoxNews.com also appear tobe concealing Breitbart’s failure and Fox News’ own horrendous coverage.
And nowBreitbart is trying to cover his outrageous smear of one woman by baselesslyattacking a whole group of people as racist. Will the media comply?
Will media fall for Breitbart’s attempt to spin his spectacular failure?
21 Jul 2010
by in Uncategorized Tags: face value, harrassment, legit, naacp, racism
I think Sheryl Sherrod is totally legit and a genuine loving caring person who did not discriminate against that White farmer. she resigned out of force and harrassment.The farmer's wife called in behalf of her to support her that Sherrod did everything in her power to help save her farm from foreclosure (CNN). People will see what they see at face value. The video took things out of context, and people need to stop misjudging before getting all their facts straight.
Flat out racism.
She fits right in at the NAACP.
racism is always a misjudgement.
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .“~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,
. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,
. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,
. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . … . /
. . . . . . `~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./…..,__
,,_. . . . . }.>-._. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,
. .. `=~-,__. . . `,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>–==“
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`
Stop trying to cover for the obviously guilty.
Her story was very sad because she and her fellow member of the Worker Class were not helping eachother. This is why we need to do away with big government oversight and regulation. Free Market principles and the Ownership Class should decide which farms survive and which farms fail.
ok, try it in this context: imagine she was white and admitted not helping a black person. imagine how misjudged she would be. that should help us keep our facts straight.
sparta23- so black folks get a pass for the same thing you want whitey crucified for. good to know, really puts your viewpoint in context
No way !!! Her words were just taken out of context….she actually said that at first, that racist black woman.
I agree. she was forced out of her job and it's wrong. Cons went on the attack because of the Lincoln letter that got a tea party leader expelled.
She said herself that she didn't give the farmer all the help she could….. because he was WHITE and "all she could think of was the black farmers who lost their land".
Sounds like she got hosed & asked to fall on her sword out of political correctness. It is really no different then what happened to Don Imus, rush Limbaugh etc. a marginal statement was twisted & heads had to fall.
Looks like the White House jumped the gun on this one.
====
Shirley Sherrod, ex-USDA worker: White House forced me to resign over fabricated racial controversy
BY Aliyah Shahid
One strike and she was out.
A black employee who resigned from the Agriculture Department on Monday said the White House forced her out after remarks that she says have sparked a fabricated racial controversy.
Shirley Sherrod, the former Georgia director of Rural Development, said she received a phone call from the USDA's deputy undersecretary Cheryl Cook on Monday while she was in a car. Cook told her that the White House wanted her to call it quits.
"They called me twice," Sherrod told the associated Press. "The last time they asked me to pull over the side of the road and submit my resignation on my Blackberry, and that's what I did."
The controversy began after several media organizations posted a 38-second video clip of Sherrod speaking to a local Georgia chapter of the NAACP. she tells the group that she did not give a white farmer "the full force of what I could do" after he asked for assistance.
The video surfaced days after the NAACP quarreled with Tea Party members over allegations of racism.
Sherrod said her statements were taken out of context.
"my point in telling that story is that working with him helped me to see that it wasn't a black and white issue," she said. Sherrod added that the episode took place in 1986 before she worked for the Agriculture Department.
Sherrod said that she eventually became friends with the farmer and worked with him for two years to help him avoid foreclosure.
The woman who says she is the wife of the farmer referenced in the clip told CNN Sherrod helped her family save their farm. Eloise Spooner described Sherrod as "getting in there and doing all she could do to help us."
President of the national NAACP, Benjamin Todd Jealous, supported the resignation, saying the organization has a zero-tolerance policy.
"according to her remarks, she mistreated a white farmer in need of assistance because of his race," he said in a statement before Sherrod's explanation.
"we are appalled by her actions, just as we are with abuses of power against farmers of color and female farmers."
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics…
She is another example of the idiots Obama puts into office simply because they are black.
The NASA director comes to mind.
Van Jones.
etc,
I wonder why do racist people attack before getting their facts straight, stew in their hate and give no means of "REFUDIATION" to change things up. Racism did not begin with black folks in this country, period…So, all of the racist snakes crawling from the rocks. The reverse racism doesn't work on me or my views of my people, you clearly have a pychological problem if you think that this woman or the NAACP are the cause of racism. The NAACP was organized to counteract the mistreatment & racism caused by white folks.. …
See when we point out white racism, we are in fact pointing out where it ORIGINATED period!!! When you remove a tree you have to get at the root, to remove it completely.
What happens in the case of whites point out black racism, is that you try an place it on us like we are the original race haters. No, when you look at yourself and come clean like she has done then you shall help in eliminating the differences. But, until then you can't continue to think that these mind games can endure forever..
Boy are you full of it!!
You don't go to a function like that and start spouting off racial comments! Not unless your a member of the kkk or black panthers!! Clearly racist org's.!!
What I'm seeing and hearing is there's a completion between racist groups to have as many anti whatever causes they can come up with!!
Racism is either a no-no or a good thing! It isn't a no-no for one and a good thing for another!! You want equality? This is the place to start!!
Put up or shut up!!!!!!
I watched the whole 45 minute tape of what she said – not the 1 minute sound byte. she told a tale of not wanting to go out of the way for the farmer, then realizing that it's not about white or black it's about people being abused by the system so she stepped up to help after initially wanting him to go elsewhere for help. When she and the white farmer met with the white lawyer he had chosen, who did nothing for him and was going to let him lose his farm – she became determined to help him keep his farm. she then became his advocate. That's the story. Separately, her father was murdered in 1965 by a white man for racial reasons. Then a mob of white men returned to the house to intimidate the widow and her small children. look for the full version on YouTube. Fox is racemongering and it's working.
Shirley Sherrod: Was it a case of misjudgement?
19 Jul 2010
by in Uncategorized Tags: obama, politicians, racism, world trade center
BY:turbo 1 hour 48 minutes ago on Politics
Refute has been used in political contexts many times over and most of the times it has been seen being used wrongly when it was used to represent the meaning “disapprove” whereas its actual meaning is “disprove”. Sarah Palin has created a new word in the English language that is an offspring of the word Refute. the new word is “refudiate” and it was used by Sarah Palin in many tweets. The first use of the word “refudiate” was when she was addressing president Obama about the issue of racism of the rightwing tea party movement. after that she used the word again when she was addressing peaceful Muslims about the Islamic building near world trade center. In her third tweet she misused the word “refute” where she was trying to use the word disapprove. In the third instance Palin couldn’t really be blamed because politicians have long misused the word “refute” but the Twitter messages before the third one are unforgivable in terms of misuse of a word and then the inclusion of that word with another word to create a new word. Apparently the Twitter messages were deleted soon after publishing proving that Sarah Palin felt a little embarrassed, but after a while she actually decided to celebrate her new invention by comparing herself with Shakespeare and George W. Bush. She says that both these people created new words so why shouldn’t I. the argument is valid, but she could at least look up the correct meaning of “refute” before indulging into her creative side. 
Refudiate by Palin
RSS